Join us in voting NO on Prop I

“This measure would make it harder for us to respond quickly when San Franciscans call for help for years to come.” 

Sam Gebler President of SF Firefighter Association 

“The stakes are too high to be fooled by yet another intentionally misleading ballot measure" 

Mayor Daniel Lurie

Mayor Daniel Lurie

San Francisco Firefighters Local 798

San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council

SEIU Local 87 Janitors

Operating Engineers Local 3

Supervisor Matt Dorsey

San Francisco Democratic Party

San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs Association

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 6

Iron Workers Local 376

Supervisor Stephen Sherrill

Supervisor Rafael Mandelman

North Coast States Carpenters Union

Stationary Engineers Local 39 

Elevator Constructors Local 8

Sprinkler Fitters Local 483

UA Local 38 Plumbers

Supervisor Alan Wong

Teamsters Local 350

Teamsters Local 665

SPUR

San Francisco Chamber of Commerce

San Francisco YIMBY 

United Democratic Club

Eastern Neighborhoods Democratic Club

NO ON THE NONPROFIT SLUSH FUND THAT WON’T BUILD NEW HOUSING

Prop I is a deceptively written measure that claims to be about affordable housing, but instead creates a 120 million dollar nonprofit slush fund that blows a hole in our city’s budget. That’s money that could be used for firefighters, public safety, and cleaning our streets that instead will be funneled to just a handful of nonprofits.

What’s even worse, Prop I doesn’t require a single new unit of housing to be built in SF. 

"...would increase the City’s projected General Fund deficit by $120 million annually." 
Official City Controller's Report 

HERE’S THE REAL BREAKDOWN OF HOW PROP I WILL SPEND YOUR TAX DOLLARS:

30% of the funding has to be spent on “social housing” — which is low to moderate income housing that’s run by tenant collectives or communal resident boards.[3]

25% gives money to nonprofits to buy apartments which takes them out of rent control and off the rental market.[2]

10% funds nonprofit programs that have nothing to do with building new homes.[1]

5% is locked away for administration and bureaucracy.[4]

70% of the money that doesn’t have to be spent on building housing! 

Why write a measure this confusing? Because the handful of nonprofits who support it want you to hand them a guaranteed pipeline of tax dollars with little accountability. 

That’s why the people who actually build housing in San Francisco don’t support Prop I. It doesn’t fund housing construction, it just funds nonprofits.

San Francisco's housing crisis is simple: rents and home prices have climbed faster than paychecks. And thats pricing teachers, nurses, and multigenerational families out of their communities. 

THE HOUSING CRISIS IS REAL

THE HOUSING TRUST FUND IS HOW SF BUILDS AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Proposition C renews San Francisco's most significant source of funding for  affordable housing. For over a decade, the Housing Trust Fund has enabled San Francisco to turn empty vacant lots into new units of affordable housing.  But it also helps first-time buyers purchase a home, keeps first responders in the city they serve with down payment assistance, and enables seniors to stay in their communities with rental assistance.

RENEWS FUNDING FOR THE TRUST FUND

Prop C renews the Housing Trust Fund through 2058 and increases its annual funding to $125 million. Every year we wait, the fund stays capped while rents keep climbing.

IT WON'T RAISE OUR TAXES

Prop C does not raise anyone's taxes. It reallocates money the City already collects, making it fiscally responsible by design. Funding only grows when the City's own property tax or general fund revenue grows and the City can pause or reduce contributions during a real budget deficit. This is a careful, sustainable plan, not a blank check. Every dollar is legally dedicated to affordable housing and subject to independent audit.

A TRUE CONSENSUS MEASURE

It was placed on the ballot unanimously by the Board of Supervisors and Mayor Lurie, and is supported by labor and housing advocates across the city.

Check the facts

[1] Controller’s Report & Affordable Housing Guarantee Act SEC. 10.100-12. HOUSE SF FUND (c) (2) (A) (B)

[2] Affordable Housing Guarantee Act SEC. 10.100-12. HOUSE SF FUND (c) (3) (A)

[3] Affordable Housing Guarantee Act SEC. 10.100-12. HOUSE SF FUND (c) (2) (A) (i) & (3) (A) (v)

[4] Affordable Housing Guarantee Act SEC. 1102.3 HOUSE SF TAX IMPOSED

Ad paid for by Yes on C, No on I, SF for Accountability in Housing Sponsored by the San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council and San Francisco Chamber of Commerce. Ad committee top funders:

  1. Michael Moritz ($200,000)

  2. The Related Companies/William Witte ($200,000)

  3. San Francisco Apartment Association Issues Political Action Committee ($191,000) – contributors include California Apartment Association Issues Committee ($185,000), San Francisco Apartment Association Political Action Committee ($53,001)        

Financial disclosures are available at sfethics.org